More than ten old ages after the United States invaded Afghanistan to get the better of the Taliban and set up a modern state province, the US finds itself unable to accomplish those aims with limited success in the Afghan nation-building attempt.[ 1 ]In many ways, the current state of affairs in Afghanistan mirrors another episode in the state ‘s yesteryear, the modernisation plan of King Amanullah, a century earlier. He excessively sought to transform a rural and tribal society into a modern nation-state in a top-down attack, but met with stiff opposition, with a rebellion in Khost in 1924 and another tribal rebellion in 1929, which resulted in Amanullah ‘s self-exile in Italy hardly ten old ages after his dominance to the throne, and the dismantlement of the modernisation plan.[ 2 ]Like the US in post-2011 Afghanistan, Amanullah had a Western-centric attack to modernness, and wanted to follow both stuff and immaterial facets of Western society and administration, which would co-exist with Islam.[ 3 ]
This was the consequence of the extremist transmutation brushing the Muslim universe in the early twentieth century, with the great Islamic states of Turkey and Iran flinging centuries of tradition and cultural patterns.[ 4 ]Mahmud Tarzi, Amanullah ‘s male parent in jurisprudence, led a progressive motion in Afghanistan which argued that the failing of Afghanistan was due to her societal and political disunity, and lower status in the “ cultural, economic and industrial spheres ” .[ 5 ]This paper argues that Amanullah would set Tarzi ‘s vision into pattern, and effort to set up a modern state province of Afghanistan, through reforms that would centralize authorization, unite a divided society and lay the basis for an industrialised economic system. However, Amanullah failed in the execution of the reforms, which ended up estranging the population, and the traditional power groups. His inability to rally sufficient military force to endorse his reforms would be the concluding nail in the casket.
We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!
II CENTRALISATION OF AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATION
The one aim that no Afghan swayer had genuinely achieved was the complete fusion of the state under a cardinal authorities, and the constitution of a modern nation-state. Barfield notes that the authorization of the cardinal authorities merely applied in its full extent within the urban countries, with the rural countries staying mostly independent.[ 6 ]The delicate nature of the province ensured that impermanent centralization and fusion were dependent on a strong leader, and his decease would ensue in civil war until the following strong leader came along.[ 7 ]However, Amanullah had an chance to interrupt this rhythm in 1919, when he waged the Third Anglo-Afghan War and secured Afghanistan ‘s independency from Britain.[ 8 ]With the important political capital he gained from this success, Amanullah set out to accomplish what his predecessors had failed to make, and hammer Afghanistan into a modern nation-state.[ 9 ]
Amanullah ‘s first measure was to centralize administrative maps and political authorization, which Weber argues is indispensable in the passage to a state province.[ 10 ]For the first clip in Afghan history, a cabinet and legislative assembly were set up to help the sovereign with authorities.[ 11 ]In 1923, the Basic Codes of the High State of Afghanistan, a de facto Constitution, was drafted with the aid of Turkish experts.[ 12 ]The Constitution introduced several wholly new constructs to Afghanistan, such as the freedoms of faith, address and the imperativeness.[ 13 ]The Constitution besides established the regulation of jurisprudence and the construct of a constitutional monarchy, where the legitimacy of the male monarch no longer rested on Islam, but popular legitimacy.[ 14 ]Amanullah besides made judicial reforms, with the debut of new Torahs based on secular Turkish legal codifications, and the codification of Islamic law jurisprudence, which would be exercised by a new system of secular tribunals.[ 15 ]Ultimately, the political and legal reforms intended to reassign power from the spiritual constitution ( ulema ) , who had great influence from its ability to construe the Islamic law, to the monarchy and the cardinal authorities.
One of the administrative maps which Amanullah intended to convey under the control of the cardinal authorities was instruction. He considered “ ignorance ” of the Afghan people to be responsible for the retardation of the state, therefore instruction reform was “ closest to [ his ] bosom ” .[ 16 ]Prior to 1920, instruction was controlled by the ulama and mostly consisted of rote acquisition sacred texts and classical plants, with a national literacy rate of hardly 2 % .[ 17 ]A secular course of study was introduced aboard Islamic topics, and new schools were set up to supply vocational preparation.[ 18 ]Compulsory instruction was besides introduced in 1924 and while it was surely non applicable to the full state due to a deficiency of resources, Amanullah did try to do more options available.[ 19 ]For case, he built new primary and secondary schools and dark literacy categories were opened for grownup scholars, where the King himself on occasion taught.[ 20 ]Amanullah took his instruction reforms highly earnestly and made the Medal of Education the highest ornament in the state.[ 21 ]
A centralized state province would necessitate an ground forces loyal to the cardinal authorities. However, the ground forces of Amanullah ‘s predecessors consisted of soldiers nominated by the leading of the folks and still maintained their several tribal truenesss.[ 22 ]Furthermore, the ground forces proved to be incapable of supporting the state against foreign menaces, evident in the close loss to the British during the Third Anglo-Afghan War, had the Wazir and Mahsud tribes non been mustered in clip.[ 23 ]To rectify these lacks, Amanullah adopted advice from Tarzi and Turkish military advisers to make a professional ground forces that consisted of work forces from the full population, with trueness to the cardinal authorities instead than the folks.[ 24 ]Universal muster was introduced for all work forces at age 21 for a period of two old ages, subsequently extended to three.[ 25 ]Since most of the soldiers in the ground forces were veterans and immune to alter, Amanullah reduced the wage of the soldier four crease to merely 4 rupees a month in order to coerce older soldiers out of the ground forces.[ 26 ]To counterbalance for the lower wage, soldiers were to be given a bundle of benefits, such as cooked nutrient and uniforms.[ 27 ]Inspired by the British usage of air power during the Third Anglo-Afghan War, Amanullah besides established an air force with aid from the Soviets, who provided 13 aeroplanes every bit good as pilot preparation.[ 28 ]
III UNIFICATION OF SOCIETY
The state province that Amanullah envisioned could non be achieved by merely centralizing power and authorization, but besides the fusion of the “ multiethnic, multi-lingual and multi-religious society ” that had merely been temporarily unified in the yesteryear through the usage of force.[ 29 ]Amanullah sought to interrupt down the divides in society by first get rid ofing bondage and child labor.[ 30 ]Religious freedom was besides granted to minority communities, who were encouraged to play an active function in the province.[ 31 ]Amanullah besides encouraged the usage of Western frock in topographic point of traditional outfits, in the hope of doing the social divides less seeable.[ 32 ]The most important facet of the societal reforms was Amanullah ‘s determination to liberate adult females so they could play an equal function in society. For the first clip in Afghan history, and in most parts of the Islamic universe, adult females were granted the freedom of pick in matrimony, equal rights to inheritance, a minimal age for matrimony and legal protection against maltreatment.[ 33 ]Queen Soraya was a cardinal figure in this emancipation procedure, and publically advocated for alteration in the functions of adult females every bit good as adult females ‘s rights to instruction, employment and divorce.[ 34 ]The first primary school for misss was opened in 1921, yet another first in Afghan history.[ 35 ]Amanullah attempted to utilize Islam to support such alterations. For case, he discouraged the pattern of polygamy and attempted to portray monogamousness as inherently more Islamic.[ 36 ]Womans were besides encouraged to unveil, and the head covering was portrayed as a “ tribal usage ” instead than a demand of Islam.[ 37 ]Queen Soraya stated in a address that the reforms were intended to let Afghan adult females to play a function in the province “ in the mode of the adult females of early Islam ”[ 38 ]
IV THE SEEDS OF INDUSTRALIZATION
Amanullah ‘s expansive strategy for modernisation required huge amounts of money, but foreign assistance was no longer a feasible option. The British had rescinded their one-year fiscal subsidy after the Third Afghan War and were successful in carrying other universe powers from giving any to Amanullah.[ 39 ]The Soviets promised Amanullah one million roubles a twelvemonth to replace the British subsidy, but this was grant was irregular.[ 40 ]To do Afghanistan economically independent, Amanullah set out on a way of economic reforms which were intended to get down the procedure of industrialisation in Afghanistan.[ 41 ]He foremost started with a reorganization and rationalising of the revenue enhancement system, including the abolishment of arbitrary revenue enhancements such as those collected for “ oil for the queen ‘s hair ” .[ 42 ]He besides introduced the first national budget in the history of Afghanistan and the afghani, a new currency which replaced the mostly valueless rupee.[ 43 ]In order to finance the industrialisation thrust, Amanullah set out to better agricultural productiveness. This was achieved through a policy of land reform, where public land was sold to hapless provincials at the low monetary value of 10 afghanis per jerib ( 0.5 estates ) of irrigated land.[ 44 ]
Amanullah besides began be aftering for the substructure demands of an industrialised economic system, with the building of communicating webs such as roads, telegraphic, telephone lines and postal services.[ 45 ]The centerpiece of the substructure development was the Great North Road, which would eventually supply a direct connexion between Northern and Southern Afghanistan through the Hindu Kush.[ 46 ]By the late 1920s, Afghanistan was besides connected by air to Tashkent, Tehran and India.[ 47 ]Amanullah besides purchased equipment to set-up a light industrial sector in Afghanistan, with industries such as carpentry, fabrics and papermaking.[ 48 ]Students were besides set abroad to work every bit learners in European and Iranian mills, to derive proficient accomplishments which would be used to develop new industries in Afghanistan.[ 49 ]
V MISMANAGEMENT OF REFORMS
Amanullah ‘s modernisation plan was comprehensive and left no rock unturned in its purpose to reform Afghanistan. Had the reforms been spaced out over a longer period of clip and prioritised consequently, with instruction and economic steps taking topographic point before more controversial 1s such as the liberalization of adult females, they may really good hold succeeded. However, the success of the modernisation thrust depended on a swayer who was “ a superb decision maker and a maestro politician ” , which Amanullah was non.[ 50 ]He had no political experience and his modernisation program was based wholly on theory he “ learnt through books ” .[ 51 ]Furthermore, Amanullah allowed his personal embarrassment at Afghanistan ‘s retardation to overcast his judgement, turning a long-run reform procedure into a rushed scuffle to demo the universe that “ Afghanistan exists on the map ” .[ 52 ]Of the 76 edicts issued by Amanullah throughout his reign, covering every facet of the modernisation plan, 57 were issued before the Khost Rebellion in 1924.[ 53 ]In his haste to reform Afghanistan, Amanullah did non rather see how he would implement his new steps. For case, the misguided acceptance of the metric system was rapidly dropped and the abolishment of bondage and forced labor was in all likeliness wholly ignored outside of Kabul.[ 54 ]The judicial reforms did non work either since there was n’t a individual Afghan attorney trained in secular law and spiritual tribunals continued to judge instances as they had ever done.[ 55 ]In fact, most of Amanullah ‘s reforms did non widen beyond the direct control of the cardinal authorities, which was restricted to Kabul and the neighbouring states.[ 56 ]By 1928, Amanullah was practically pleading with Afghans to collaborate with his modernisation plan, stating them that “ he advises you, implores you and imperativenesss you, but beyond that he can make nil ” .[ 57 ]
Furthermore, Amanullah ‘s haste to do Afghanistan look modern every bit shortly as possible, led to unneeded and dearly-won undertakings such as the new capital of Dar-ul-Aman, which cost ten million rupees, one tierce of the province ‘s one-year income.[ 58 ]How precisely did Amanullah wage for these undertakings, particularly since he received small to no foreign support? What Poullada calls the “ singular effort ” of domestically funding the full modernisation plan, was really achieved through a important addition in revenue enhancement.[ 59 ]Over the 10 twelvemonth period of Amanullah ‘s reign, the land revenue enhancement increased four times, while livestock revenue enhancement increased 2 to 5 times.[ 60 ]While most of Amanullah ‘s reforms and undertakings were restricted to Kabul, given the cardinal authorities ‘s limited range, the rural provincials ended up bearing the cost.[ 61 ]It is no surprise that the heavy revenue enhancement load on the peasantry generated such bitterness that they supported the tribal and spiritual leaders against Amanullah, as the Soviet Central Asian newspaper Pravda Vostoka noted at the clip.[ 62 ]Had Amanullah taken his predecessor Abdul Rahman ‘s warning that reform should non be introduced “ in such a haste as to put the people against their swayer ” , the rebellion in 1929 might hold been averted.[ 63 ]
VI ALIENATION OF TRADITIONAL POWER
Zapf notes that modernisation is “ non a consensual procedure, but a competition between modernizers, conservativists and bystanders ” , which Amanullah ended up losing.[ 64 ]Previous swayers had been to the full cognizant of the power commanded by the traditional forces in the state, the tribal leaders and the ulama, and either ruthlessly suppressed the folks or treated them with regard.[ 65 ]Amanullah did neither while spread outing his ain power, doing a rebellion inevitable. With the cardinal authorities presuming duty over undertakings which had antecedently been performed at the local degree, such as muster and revenue enhancement, many tribal leaders found themselves losing power and chances for corruptness.[ 66 ]Tribal leaders besides resented the policy of cosmopolitan muster, since they feared that a big and loyal ground forces would tip the balance of power in favor of the cardinal authorities.[ 67 ]Furthermore, in Amanullah ‘s thrust to prioritize disbursement, he cut the subsidies to the folks that old swayers had instituted.[ 68 ]Not merely did Amanullah assail the “ bags ” of the tribal head, but besides their “ pride ” .[ 69 ]Traditional ranks and rubrics were abolished in the spirit of equality, while tribal heads were non exempt from Amanullah ‘s anti-corruption thrust, which even ended up with his relation, the Durrani tribal main Sarwar Khan being jailed.[ 70 ]This represented a gross misdemeanor of tribal impressions of affinity and trueness.
It is perplexing that Amanullah did non recognize the serious menace from the ulama, since the relationship between old swayers and the spiritual constitution had been combative. Abdul Rahman was merciless to mullahs who opposed him and claimed that they would go forth the state either through expatriate or “ going into the following universe ” .[ 71 ]When a few Mullah publically opposed Habibullah ‘s trip to India at the invitation of the British, he quickly executed them.[ 72 ]Amanullah started off with considerable legitimacy among the ulama due to his anti-colonial stance, but this rapidly eroded due to his foreign policy outreach towards Turkey and Persia, which were viewed as anti-Islam due to their secularisation plans, every bit good as the atheist Soviet Union and Britain.[ 73 ]Furthermore, the ulama detested Amanullah ‘s centralizing policies and societal reforms, which were viewed as authorities invasions into their traditional countries of influence.[ 74 ]For case, spiritual functionaries made money from difference declarations, which was at menace from the centralization of the judicial system.[ 75 ]The fundamental law and Torahs promulgated by Amanullah besides posed a menace to the ulama ‘s influence and power which was derived from their function in specifying and construing spiritual Torahs.
The matrimony of convenience between the tribal leaders and the ulama foremost reared its caput in 1924, when Mullah Abdullah aka the Lame Mullah succeeded in carrying the leaders of the Mangal and Jadran folks in Khost that Amanullah was trying to sabotage their authorization, taking to a rebellion which cost the lives of 14,000 people.[ 76 ]The relationship between Amanullah and the ulama worsened when the latter took advantage of the Khost Rebellion to coerce Amanullah to modify the Constitution and let them to reexamine all future Torahs, doing him highly bitter.[ 77 ]After his European trip in 1928, Amanullah for all intents declared war on the spiritual constitution by publically assailing them as “ corrupt ” and “ shockable ” and as “ instruments of foreign machination ” , declining to run into them and even stoping their stipends from the province.[ 78 ]Amanullah even threatened to coerce all spiritual functionaries to be educated by state-sponsored Islamic schools, and prohibition all those who had been trained in the Deoband School.[ 79 ]The concluding straw came during the loya jirgah of 1928, when Amanullah insulted both tribal and spiritual leaders by coercing them to European apparels when he provided.[ 80 ]
VII LACK OF COERCIVE FORCE
Despite the resistance from the tribal and spiritual leaders and the discontent among the population, Amanullah could still hold salvaged his regulation and the modernisation plan had he been able to call up an equal degree of coercive force.[ 81 ]After all, the rebellion was non a countrywide one, but localised in the Pashtun-occupied countries of the state.[ 82 ]Amanullah ‘s predecessor Abdul Rahman had relied on the ground forces in a run of “ internal imperialism ” where insubordinate folks were forced into subjection.[ 83 ]Ataturk had besides warned Amanullah that a strong ground forces was indispensable for the success of his modernisation plan. However, Amanullah ‘s ground forces failed in both the Khost Rebellion of 1924, where merely tribal intercession saved the twenty-four hours and the concluding rebellion in 1928.[ 84 ]
Ironically, it was Amanullah ‘s reforms which were intended to make a strong and loyal ground forces, that due to his ain carelessness, “ functionally dismantled and finally destroyed ” the armed forces.[ 85 ]The Turkish advice to wholly reconstruct the armed forces from the group up, by replacing veterans with natural recruits in “ theoretical account battalions ” resulted in an untrained ground forces.[ 86 ]More significantly, the benefits which were supposed to counterbalance for wage cuts fell by the roadside due to administrative holds and corruptness.[ 87 ]Soldiers now had neither money nor benefits, ensuing in a loss of morale and professionalism, as they had to take on side occupations to back up themselves.[ 88 ]To add hurt to diss, soldiers who prided themselves on a militaristic tribal civilization now had to larn warfare from aliens.[ 89 ]While the ground forces in the clip of Abdul Rahman numbered over 60,000, Amanullah ‘s ground forces faced enlisting jobs and finally shrivel to merely 11,000.[ 90 ]All these factors resulted in an ill-trained ground forces with low morale and no trueness, which was incapable of combating the tribal rebellion which overthrew Amanullah, and mostly deserted him before the terminal.[ 91 ]
Poullada tries to support Amanullah for the province of the military, saying that Amanullah made a commendable attempt in reforming it, but “ success eluded him ” .[ 92 ]However, the ground forces had already failed one time during the Khost Rebellion and Amanullah should hold made alterations to the military reforms. There is besides no alibi for Amanullah non listening to advice from his curate of war Nadir Shah, who warned him about the importance of the ground forces.[ 93 ]Ironically, Amanullah ‘s carelessness in keeping the military came about from his belief that he would ever be able to rally the folks to cover with military menaces, until he found that this was non the instance in 1929.[ 94 ]
The age old adage that “ the route to hell is paved with good purposes ” can be to the full applied to Amanullah ‘s modernisation plan. Like the Americans a century subsequently, Amanullah ‘s house belief in the virtues of modernisation to Afghanistan blinded him to the harm that his reforms were making to the delicate power construction of the state. As such, the modernisation plan was doomed to failaˆ¦aˆ¦ The age old adage that “ the route to hell is paved with good purposes ” can be to the full applied to Amanullah ‘s modernisation plan. Like the Americans a century subsequently, Amanullah ‘s house belief in the virtues of modernisation to Afghanistan blinded him to the harm that his reforms were making to the delicate power construction of the state. As such, the modernisation plan was doomed to failaˆ¦aˆ¦
( 3183 words )
Ahmad, N.D. The Survival of Afghanistan, 1747-1979. Lahore: Insittute of Islamic Culture, 1990.
Barfield, Thomas. Afghanistan: a cultural and political history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
Baynard, Sally Ann. “ Historical Setting. ” In Afghanistan, A Country Study, edited by Richard F. Nyrop and Donald M. Seekins, 1-74. Washington, D.C: Foreign Area Studies, The American University, 1986.
Burki, Shireen Khan. “ The Politicss of Zan from Amanullah to Karzai. ” In Land of the Unconquerable: The Lifes of Contemporary Afghan Women, edited by Jennifer Heath and Ashraf Zahedi, 45-59. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2011.
Christensen, Asger. Helping Afghanistan: The Background and Prospects for Reconstruction in a Disconnected Society. Kobenhavn: NIAS Publishing, 1995.
Dessaso, Christopher D. Toward Development of Afghanistan National Stability: Analysiss in Historical, Military and Cultural Contexts. Kansas: School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College, 2010.
Dupree, Louis. “ Afghanistan, 1880-1973. ” In Commoners, Climbers and Notables, edited by C.A.O. Nieuwenhuijze, 152-174. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1977.
Emadi, Hafizullah. Repression, Resistance and Women in Afghanistan. Westport CT: Praeger, 2002.
Felbab-Brown, Vanda. Afghanistan Ten Years after 9/11: Counterterrorism Accomplishments while a Civil War Is Lurking? Brookings Institute ( 2011 ) . hypertext transfer protocol: //www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/09/06-afghanistan-felbabbrown ( accessed 01 October 2012 ) .
Gregorian, Vartan. “ Mahmud Tarzi and Saraj-ol-Akhbar: Political orientation of Nationalism and Modernization in Afghanistan. ” Middle East Journal 21, No. 3 ( 1967 ) : 345-368.
Gregorian, Vartan. The Emergence of Modern Afghanistan. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969.
Jalali, Ali A. Rebuilding Afghanistan ‘s National Army. Carlisle: US Army War College, 2002.
Malik, Aqab M. The modernization procedure in Afghanistan – a retrospective. Capital of pakistan: Institute of Security Studies Islamabad, 2012.
Olesen, Asta. Islam and Politics in Afghanistan. Capital of virginia: Curzon Press, 1995.
Poullada, Leon B. Reform and Rebellion in Afghanistan, 1919-1929. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1973.
Overby, Paul. Amanullah: The Hard Case of Reform in Afghanistan. Occasional Paper 31. New York: The Afghanistan Forum, 1992.
Saikal, Amin. Modern Afghanistan, A History of Struggle and Survival. London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2004.
Shahrani, M. Nazif. “ King Aman-Allah of Afghanistan ‘s failed nation-building
undertaking and its wake ( reexamine article ) . ” Persian Studies 38, No. 4 ( 2005 ) : 661-675.
Suhrke, Astri and Borchgrevink, Kaja. “ Negotiating justness sector reform in Afghanistan. ” Crime, Law and Social Change 51, No. 2 ( 2008 ) : 211-230.
Suhrke, Astri. “ Exogenous State-Building: The Contradictions of the International Project in Afghanistan. ” In The Rule of Law in Afghanistan: Missing in Inaction, edited by Whit Mason, 225-248. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Tomsen, Peter. The Wars of Afghanistan. New York: Public Affairs, 2011.
Weber, Max. “ Politics as a Career. ” In Max Weber: Essaies in Sociology, edited by H.H. Gerth, 77-128. London: Routledge, 1948.
Zapf, Wolfgang. Modernization theory: and the non-western universe. Emeriti Projekte: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung, 2004.